Why are many of major media outlets predicting a favorable outcome for Democrats this time?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote an article on 2004 Election a while back; the article is titled “Was the 2004 Election Stolen?” He also wrote a kind of follow up article; the article is titled “Will The Next Election be Hacked” It’s no doubt that he’s a Democrat, and he generally takes the side of Democrats. For example, while he criticizes the current voting problem, he rarely discusses JFK’s election story. That being said, these two are well-written articles, and he backs up his claim by referencing numerous sources. Also the voting problem has been reportedly pretty widely by independent media and foreign media outlets such as BBC. It is quite clear that the current voting system is a fraudulent system; in particular, voting machines do not deliver any reliable result. It’s not an exaggeration to say that voting machines are designed to disenfranchise all voters. Even some in the major media mentioned about the problem of voting machines recently. However, there is something peculiar about this election. In 2000, 2002 and 2004 elections, major media outlets essentially accepted results of three elections without mentioning about any major election fraud, and they also never really predicted any favorable outcome for Democrats prior to elections. Many of major media outlets are predicting a favorable outcome for Democrats this time. It’s a bizarre behavior. If history tells us anything, this election will be disenfranchised again, and it is likely that Republicans are going to win enough seats both in the Congress and in the Senate to keep their control. Why are many of major media outlets predicting a favorable outcome for Democrats this time? Puzzling.
